Re: unsafeCoerce#

Hi

In that bit of the manual it also has inline as both the section
headings, so lazy won't show up in the table of contents. (a typo)

I didn't think to search the manual anyway, so it would be nice if
they could get added to the haddock index in some way.

Thanks

Neil

On 7/31/06, Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Good idea.  There's suitable section here in the HEAD manual, here:
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/dist/current/docs/users_guide/special-ids.htm
> l#id3159468
>
> I'll add a subsection about unsafeCoerce#
>
> Simon
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: glasgow-haskell-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:glasgow-haskell-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> | On Behalf Of Neil Mitchell
> | Sent: 31 July 2006 00:45
> | To: glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> | Subject: unsafeCoerce#
> |
> | Hi,
> |
> | Finding unsafeCoerce# in the documentation is challenging at best.
> | It's not indexed by Haddock, which in turn means its not indexed by
> | Hoogle. Lambdabot doesn't find it. Googling gave me GhcExts (from an
> | old Happy file), which I guessed at GHC.Exts.
> |
> | Someone in #haskell suggested GHC.Base. I'm not sure where I should
> | import it from, but it would be nice if the docs included it
> | somewhere.
> |
> | Thanks
> |
> | Neil
> | _______________________________________________
> | Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
> | Glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> | http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs