|
Re: runghc takes modules from current working directory: msg#00039lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs
On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 12:41:32PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > On 20 August 2005 22:38, Frederik Eaton wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > It seems like it would be nice to have runghc not take modules from > > the current working directory in many cases since it breaks > > abstraction. It looks like it may be only a real problem for > > debugging, when modules are supposed to be in a package somewhere, but > > aren't, and the current directory happens to have files of the same > > name, but in those cases it can be quite a pain to track down the > > error. The problem comes up especially often when one writes scripts > > in haskell to work with haskell packages or generate haskell code. Do > > people frequently use the "find modules in the current directory" > > feature, or could they be asked to do that with > > > > {-# OPTIONS_GHC -i. #-} > > > > ? (I don't think this works yet) Otherwise maybe a special option > > could be added to tell runghc not to look in the current directory? > > > > Frederik > > runghc -i foo.hs? I'm talking about "#!" scripts, for which the interpreter is hidden from the user. I tried putting "#!/usr/bin/runghc -i" at the top of a script and it failed with "Failed to load interface for `Main'"... Frederik -- http://ofb.net/~frederik/
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: mysterious directory include error, Frederik Eaton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [ ghc-Bugs-1285326 ] scavenge_one: strange object 47, SourceForge.net |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: runghc takes modules from current working directory, Simon Marlow |
| Next by Thread: | RE: runghc takes modules from current working directory, herington, dean |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |