|
[ ghc-Bugs-1183229 ] Missing 'x' in User's Guide 7.7: Arrow Notation: msg#00072lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs
Bugs item #1183229, was opened at 2005-04-14 18:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonpj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1183229&group_id=8032 Category: Documentation Group: 6.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Daniel Brown (danb_was_taken) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Missing 'x' in User's Guide 7.7: Arrow Notation Initial Comment: Just before Section 7.7.1, the documentation claims that proc x -> f x -<< x+1 is equivalent to arr (\ x -> (f, x+1)) >>> app If I understand arrows correctly, this should be arr (\ x -> (f x, x+1)) >>> app ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Simon Peyton Jones (simonpj) Date: 2005-04-15 15:54 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=50165 Fixed, thank you Ross. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=1183229&group_id=8032
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [ ghc-Bugs-1183840 ] (OS X) Can't link MonadCont, but ghci works, SourceForge.net |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [ ghc-Bugs-1183840 ] (OS X) Can't link MonadCont, but ghci works, SourceForge.net |
| Previous by Thread: | [ ghc-Bugs-1183229 ] Missing 'x' in User's Guide 7.7: Arrow Notation, SourceForge.net |
| Next by Thread: | calling back to Haskell from several C threads, Bulat Ziganshin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |