|
RE: win98, ctrl-c & System.system (was: Updated 6.4 Windows installer RC): msg#00139lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs
On 23 March 2005 17:06, Claus Reinke wrote: >> There's no such thing as cmd.exe on Win9x, it's COMMAND.EXE/COM. > > on my win98se system, there's no COMMAND.EXE, either, only > COMMAND.COM. > >> Some System.Process.* code ought to be looking at the COMSPEC env >> variable and not hard-code the name of the command processor. .... >> why the switch away from just using libc/msvcrt's system() for >> System.system? > > agreed, on both counts. sounds like a case of "never change a winning > team", not. but I guess when one introduces a new framework for > rawSystem, one wants to keep only one way of doing things instead of > two? Spot on. It's an issue of code maintainability, and consistency between System.system and System.Process.runCommand. Cheers, Simon
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: win98, ctrl-c & System.system (was: Updated 6.4 Windows installer RC), Claus Reinke |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: win98, ctrl-c & System.system (was: Updated 6.4 Windows installer RC), Simon Marlow |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: win98, ctrl-c & System.system (was: Updated 6.4 Windows installer RC), Claus Reinke |
| Next by Thread: | RE: win98, ctrl-c & System.system (was: Updated 6.4 Windows installer RC), Simon Marlow |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |