RE: url problem, missing GLUT, and building package ghc

On 15 March 2005 14:08, C.Reinke wrote:

> - package ghc
> 
>   I now seem to have a ghc from cvs head, and a package ghc in
>   ghc/compiler. From Simon's comment, it seems that trying to build
>   the package will not depend on a compiler build, so the package is
>   presumably built with the pre-installed ghc (6.4), but from the
>   sources of the cvs head. Is that correct, meaning that I should
>   register the package with the pre-installed ghc?

That's correct.  However, since these are different versions of GHC,
you'll need a set of libraries that the GHC package can use (it won't be
able to use your 6.4 libraries, because it'll complain about the version
stamps in the .hi files being different).  You should point it at the
libraries in your CVS HEAD tree instead.

Cheers,
        Simon