RE: `partition'

No, sorry.  It constitutes a change in library API, which you can't
#ifdef your way around because there isn't a CPP symbol which changes
with the patchlevel (on purpose).

Cheers,
        Simon

On 14 October 2004 11:09, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:

> Indeed, could it?
> 
> For 6.2.2 is have not been released so far ...
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Josef Svenningsson wrote:
>> A little browsing in the CVS reveals that partition is fixed in GHC's
>> libraries but that it was done after the 6.2 branch. So the 6.2
>> branch is still using the old erroneous definition.
>> 
>> Could this fix be merged into the 6.2 branch, please?
>> 
>>      /Josef
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: glasgow-haskell-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:glasgow-haskell- bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>>> Johannes Waldmann 
>>> Sent: den 14 oktober 2004 10:30
>>> To: Serge D. Mechveliani
>>> Cc: glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: Re: `partition'
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> the function  let  ns = [1 .. 10^6] :: [Int]
>>>>                    p  = partition even ns
>>>>               in
>>>>               take 2 $ fst p
>>>> 
>>>> computes too long in                 ghc-6.2.2-September-26
>>>> and needs several megabyte of stack.
>>> 
>>> this has been noticed a few times, for example
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/haskell@xxxxxxxxxxx/msg07508.html
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -- Johannes Waldmann,  Tel/Fax: (0341) 3076 6479 / 6480 --
>>> ------ http://www.imn.htwk-leipzig.de/~waldmann/ ---------
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
>>> Glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs