Re: `partition'

Indeed, could it?

For 6.2.2 is have not been released so far ...



On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Josef Svenningsson wrote:
> A little browsing in the CVS reveals that partition is fixed in GHC's
> libraries but that it was done after the 6.2 branch. So the 6.2 branch is
> still using the old erroneous definition.
> 
> Could this fix be merged into the 6.2 branch, please?
> 
>       /Josef
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: glasgow-haskell-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:glasgow-haskell-
> > bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Johannes Waldmann
> > Sent: den 14 oktober 2004 10:30
> > To: Serge D. Mechveliani
> > Cc: glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: `partition'
> > 
> > 
> > > the function  let  ns = [1 .. 10^6] :: [Int]
> > >                    p  = partition even ns
> > >               in
> > >               take 2 $ fst p
> > >
> > > computes too long in                 ghc-6.2.2-September-26
> > > and needs several megabyte of stack.
> > 
> > this has been noticed a few times, for example
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/haskell@xxxxxxxxxxx/msg07508.html
> > 
> > --
> > -- Johannes Waldmann,  Tel/Fax: (0341) 3076 6479 / 6480 --
> > ------ http://www.imn.htwk-leipzig.de/~waldmann/ ---------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
> > Glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs
> 
>