|
Re: ghci and unboxed ints: msg#00021lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs
simonpj: > I don't honestly know! I could probably find out but it'd take a bit of > poking > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: glasgow-haskell-bugs-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:glasgow-haskell-bugs- > | bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Josef Svenningsson > | Sent: 06 May 2004 14:16 > | To: Simon Peyton-Jones; 'Donald Bruce Stewart' > | Cc: glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx > | Subject: RE: ghci and unboxed ints > | > | Just out of curiosity. The number that is displayed, what does it > mean? My > | first thought was that it was the address to the allocated thunk. But > then > | since everything got the same number that doesn't seem right. > | > | Anyway, it was a fun bug :-) > | > | /Josef > | > | > -----Original Message----- > | > From: Simon Peyton-Jones [mailto:simonpj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > | > Sent: den 6 maj 2004 13:31 > | > To: Donald Bruce Stewart; Josef Svenningsson > | > Cc: glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx > | > Subject: RE: ghci and unboxed ints > | > > | > Fixed now! Thanks for pointing it out. The story is that you can > | > only bind lifted (boxed) things. Ah, of course. I was a bit confused, as: main = putStrLn (show ( let a = 1# in I# a )) does bind, and compile. But I guess that's because it isn't at the top level? -- Don
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: ghci and unboxed ints, Simon Peyton-Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: ghci and unboxed ints, Simon Peyton-Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: ghci and unboxed ints, Simon Peyton-Jones |
| Next by Thread: | RE: ghci and unboxed ints, Simon Peyton-Jones |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |