logo       

RE: Is this a known bug?: msg#00017

lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs

Subject: RE: Is this a known bug?

You need to use autoreconf, not autoconf.

I thought we'd added that to the building guide some time ago, sorry


Simon

| -----Original Message-----
| From: Duncan Coutts [mailto:duncan.coutts@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
| Sent: 04 February 2004 15:57
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxx
| Subject: RE: Is this a known bug?
|
| On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 09:51, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
| > Yes, it's a known bug. You need the HEAD, I'm afraid, where it's
been
| > fixed for some time.
|
| Ok, trying to build from cvs...
|
| I (think I've) followed the instuctions at
|
http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/building/sec-cvs.html#CVS-FIRST
|
| configure.ac references mk/config.h(.in) which doesn't seem to be in
| cvs. http://cvs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/fptools/mk/
|
| It seems it was removed
| http://cvs.haskell.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/fptools/mk/Attic/config.h.in
|
| So ./configure reports an error:
| config.status: error: cannot find input file: mk/config.h.in
|
| If I comment out that bit from configure.ac, then ./configure
completes
| with some warnings.
|
| either way, make then fails:
| make: *** No rule to make target 'mk/config.h.in', needed by
| 'mk/config.mk'. Stop.
|
| Am I doing something wrong? I was running autoconf-2.58; ./configure
| from the (renamed as per instructions) fptools directory.
|
| Duncan


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise