|
Wildly inaccurate profiling results: msg#00043lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs
I have a program, compiled with cost-center profiling on, that takes about 5 minutes, 30 seconds to run (measured with a stopwatch), but the resulting .prof file reports the total time as 34 seconds. I know that this number doesn't include overhead due to profiling, but surely the overhead can't be that much! (Also, the program runs about as long when run without -P.) I'm using a copy of GHC built from sources checked out around July 1. I'd include the program, but it's very large and I'm not sure how to minimize it and preserve the same behavior. Any ideas as to what the problem might be? Thanks, Kirsten -- Kirsten Chevalier * krc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx * Often in error, never in doubt
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | package treating, Serge D. Mechveliani |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [ ghc-Bugs-827485 ] Heap profile w/ debugging RTS dumps core, SourceForge.net |
| Previous by Thread: | Wildly inaccurate profiling results, Kirsten Chevalier |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Wildly inaccurate profiling results, Simon Marlow |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |