|
[ ghc-Bugs-759910 ] Non-exhaultive patterns from derived Read: msg#00093lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs
Bugs item #759910, was opened at 2003-06-24 16:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by simonpj You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=759910&group_id=8032 Category: Compiler Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Wont Fix Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Non-exhaultive patterns from derived Read Initial Comment: When switching from GHC 5.04.1 to 6.0 I started getting a load of warnings like these: source/SDL/Types.hs:33: Warning: Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive In a pattern binding in a 'do' expression: Patterns not matched: Text.Read.Lex.EOF Text.Read.Lex.Rat _ Text.Read.Lex.Int _ Text.Read.Lex.Symbol _ ... The source in question looks like this data Expected = ExpectedType String | ExpectedValue String deriving (Read, Show) It looks as though everything deriving Read causes this warning (there are several such constructs in the file). Deriving only Show does not. Found no mention of change to behavior of derived reads in release notes or in google. Cheers, Jason Feingold jfeingol@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Simon Peyton Jones (simonpj) Date: 2003-06-25 08:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=50165 You must be using -fwarn-simple-patterns too, right? You're right that the error message is misleading, but it's not particularly easy to fix, so I've settled for improving the documentation of that flag. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2003-06-24 16:16 Message: Logged In: NO BTW, I'm running on Windows 2000. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108032&aid=759910&group_id=8032
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Meaning of -fno-foldr-build-on?, Simon Peyton-Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | reifyDecl is completely broken, abe |
| Previous by Thread: | [ ghc-Bugs-759910 ] Non-exhaultive patterns from derived Read, SourceForge.net |
| Next by Thread: | Meaning of -fno-foldr-build-on?, Kirsten Chevalier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |