|
ghc 5.04.2 and seg fault: msg#00051lang.haskell.glasgow.bugs
> Could be a problem with the recompilation checking. We know of one > such bug: if you compile first with -O, then later without -O, > inconsistencies can arise. =20 No, I'm afraid its nothing so obvious. I can rm *.o *.exe build, run and it runs fine. However, if I alter one of the files and rebuild exactly the same way, I get the segfault, so I make clean and build from scratch each time. > If your problem is not of this form, then it would help greatly if > you could provide us with a repeatable example (indeed, it will > probably be impossible to track down without one). I'll work on it. I've been hesitating about posting this bug report for a few weeks because I couldn't come up with a small, repeatable example. > The next time it happens At this point, it always happens. > just tar up the tree and send it to us, and if you can provide a > description of which changes were made recently to the tree that > would help too. I'd love to be able to do that. Unfortunately I'm working on proprietary code, and I cannot. However as a big advocate of free software, I find it refreshing that most people make that assumption :) So anyway, I'll work on coming up with a smaller version of the bug that I can send you. In the meantime, if anyone has any other ideas of what I could do to isolate the bug, I'd be glad to try them. peace, isaac
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: funny bold ouput in GHCI, Malcolm Wallace |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: higher-order typing errors, Simon Peyton-Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: ghc 5.04.2 and seg fault, Simon Marlow |
| Next by Thread: | Invalid binding names in generated Core code, Tobias Gedell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |