logo       

Re: Imperative Object Destruction: msg#00040

lang.haskell.general

Subject: Re: Imperative Object Destruction

Hello!

On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 09:27:07AM -0000, Chris Angus wrote:
> why not create an abstract datatype

> OpenFile a which is a monad

> data OpenFile a = OpenFile (Maybe FileHandle -> IO a)

> and create you operations in terms of this

> openFile :: String -> OpenFile ()
> count :: OpenFile Int
> read :: Int -> OpenFile [Byte]

> then you could habe a run function

> runOF :: OpenFile a -> IO a

> which ran whatever you wanted for the file and ensured tahthe file was
> closed correctly afterwards.
> How we would do this with 2 files however I'm not so sure.

> [...]

That's the problem. And I think your solution is overly complicated.

Why not copy what Common Lisp does, just that Haskell can do it without
macros:

withOpenFile :: FilePath -> IOMode -> (Handle -> IO a) -> IO a
withOpenFile name mode action = do
handle <- openFile name mode
result <- (action handle) `finally` (hClose handle)
return result

Usage:

count :: Handle -> IO Int
read :: Handle -> IO [Byte]

fileLength <- withOpenFile "filename" ReadMode $ \handle ->
count handle
fileContent <- withOpenFile "filename" ReadMode $ \handle ->
read handle

or even, if you want both results without opening the file twice:
rewind :: Handle -> IO ()
(fileLength, fileContent) <- withOpenFile "filename" ReadMode $ \handle ->
do
len <- count handle
rewind handle
cont <- read handle
return (len, cont)

Two files:
result <- withOpenFile "file1" ReadMode $ \handle1 ->
withOpenFile "file2" ReadMode $ \handle2 ->
...

Kind regards,

Hannah.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise