Re: Unicode: Hugs vs GHC (again) was: Re: Some random newbie questions

In article 
<3429668D0E777A499EE74A7952C382D102F30D1B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ft.com>,
 "Simon Marlow" <simonmar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> True.  Anyone care to take Hugs' implementation of the character class
> functions and put it in GHC?

There's extensive character property tables in code in
<http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/haskell-i18n/Source/>.

The Makefile fetches the tables from the Unicode web-site and generates 
Haskell from that, so they should all be correct. It's Unicode 3.2, so 
it's a bit out of date (current is 4.0.1), but it shouldn't be too hard 
to update.

-- 
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA