|
Re: Implementing computations with timeout: msg#00106lang.haskell.cafe
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:47:12PM +0100, Tomasz Zielonka wrote: > On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:55:05PM +0200, Einar Karttunen wrote: > > if we use IO as the signature then using the TMVar has few advantages over > > using an MVar. > > Yes, I think you are right here. Hmmm, TMVar's seem to be significantly (ie. 6 times) faster than MVars in some simple tests :) Is it expected? Best regards, Tomasz |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Implementing computations with timeout: 00106, Sebastian Sylvan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Implementing computations with timeout: 00106, Tomasz Zielonka |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Implementing computations with timeouti: 00106, Tomasz Zielonka |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Implementing computations with timeout: 00106, Tomasz Zielonka |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |