Re: GHC for .NET?

In article 
<5DCA48FADB33FF4D8C32A164DF24F2B0023C12C0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ft.com>,
 "Don Syme" <dsyme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We still frequently talk about doing either Haskell.NET or a strict
> language much closer to Haskell (perhaps as a stepping stone to doing
> Haskell).  But neither are currently active projects.

I've heard complaints about the unsuitability of the Java VM for lazy 
functional languages. I wonder if the CLR also has issues for this?

-- 
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA