Re: Did anyone post a response to "the optional features considered sucky" article

There was some discussion of it on this list a few days ago:

http://archive.groovy.codehaus.org/user/threads/iemijonmaicmaddnnjcf 
(the thread)
http://archive.groovy.codehaus.org/user/messages/881 (my msg.)

Mike's blog reflects a significant amount of thought and contains lots 
of interesting details.  It deserves answers once Groovy's designers 
have agreed on the details.

-- John

On Oct 15, 2004, at 9:53, Furash Gary wrote:

> I would guess a lot of you have read the "optional features considered 
> sucky" article (http://jroller.com/page/pyrasun/20040328).  Did any of 
> the Groovy people post a response, a.la.