Did anyone post a response to "the optional features considered sucky" article

I would guess a lot of you have read the "optional features considered sucky" article (http://jroller.com/page/pyrasun/20040328).  Did any of the Groovy people post a response, a.la.

"no, it's not sucky"

"you're right, and we're fixing that in 1.8"

"no, you're sucky",

Etc.

Gary F. Furash, MBA, PMP
Applications Manager, Maricopa County Attorney's Office
furashg-sZWokWQQVgMxjvOLE2GS1/IbXMQ5te18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (602-506-0351, Pager: 602-725-1985)