logo       

Re: New supervisor restart strategy: msg#00329

lang.erlang.general

Subject: Re: New supervisor restart strategy

Chandru,

You have one supervisor for each worker. That may sound like
a lot of manpower but this is Erlang. :)

-Vance

On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:24:20AM +0000, Chandrashekhar Mullaparthi wrote:
}
} Thinking more about this, there is still one problem. All the dynamic
} children in this second level supervisor will still be affected by one of
} them misbehaving. Imagine a scenario where each child process is handling
} one TCP connection. If one of them is misbehaving, we dont want the rest of
} them to be affected. How would you achieve this using existing supervisor
} functionality.
}
} cheers
} Chandru



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise