|
Megaco and step 8 in RFC example: msg#00328lang.erlang.general
Hi, Actually it is a bug in the example of the RFC. They use "(" and ")" when they should use "{" and "}". Rather difficult to see the diff. This error also exist several of the other messages in the call sequence. Regards, /BMK Samuel Tardieu writes: > Megaco seems to be unable to parse the step 8 of RFC 3525 (Appendix > I). It chokes on "(strict=state)". > > Is that a bug in the Megaco parser or a bug in the RFC ? > > Sam -- Micael Karlberg Ericsson AB, Älvsjö Sweden Tel: +46 8 727 5668 EAB/UHK/KD - OTP Product Development ECN: 851 5668 Mail: micael.karlberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx Fax: +46 8 727 5775 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Distribution problems: 00328, Gordon Guthrie, BTP, BT, SE |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: New supervisor restart strategy: 00328, Vance Shipley |
| Previous by Thread: | Megaco and step 8 in RFC examplei: 00328, Samuel Tardieu |
| Next by Thread: | Search path for applications: 00328, Inswitch Solutions - Erlang Evaluation |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |