|
Re: ets concurrency: msg#00319lang.erlang.general
My understanding was that mnesia relies on DETS and not ETS which provides the ACID properties. >>> Joachim Durchholz <joachim.durchholz@xxxxxx> 01/29/04 06:41PM >>> Ulf Wiger wrote: > There is some support for avoiding a rehash while iterating over an > ets table. This is used by the ets:foldl and ets:foldr functions, but > there is no table locking per se. How does mnesia ensure ACID properties, if it can't rely on ETS? I imagine one shouldn't directly access the ETS tables of mnesia, but I'd like to know for sure :-) Regards, Jo -- Currently looking for a new job. ##################################################################################### The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any system and destroy all copies. ##################################################################################### |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ets concurrency: 00319, Ulf Wiger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | New supervisor restart strategy: 00319, Chandrashekhar Mullaparthi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ets concurrencyi: 00319, Bengt Kleberg (AL/EAB) |
| Next by Thread: | Megaco and step 8 in RFC example: 00319, Samuel Tardieu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |