|
Re: ets concurrency: msg#00314lang.erlang.general
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 22:09:56 -0500, Vance Shipley <vances@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Indeed. (: Can I assume that inserts, deletes and lookups are atomic? Yes (I thought this was also stated in the manual, but am too lazy to check). There is no transaction support though, so if you have to read the object before writing, ets will not protect you. There is some support for avoiding a rehash while iterating over an ets table. This is used by the ets:foldl and ets:foldr functions, but there is no table locking per se. /Uffe -- Ulf Wiger |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: parser & scanner: 00314, Ulf Wiger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Search path for applications: 00314, Inswitch Solutions - Erlang Evaluation |
| Previous by Thread: | ets concurrencyi: 00314, Vance Shipley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ets concurrency: 00314, Joachim Durchholz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |