|
Re: SMPP v5.0 erlang implementation: msg#00292lang.erlang.general
Hi Bruce, By the moment we keep on working against simulators, so I can not tell you any experiences with real SMSCs. Hopefully in the recent future (3 months maybe) will be working on a real scenario. Thanks for your feedback. I'll be glad to hear any further comment. Best regards, --- Quique http://www.des.udc.es/~mpquique/ On Tuesday 27 January 2004 04:11, Bruce Fitzsimons wrote: > Enrique Marcote Peña wrote: > >Hello, > > > >Last summer I got to finish an erlang implementation of the SMPP (Short > >Message Peer to Peer) protocol, version 5.0. Unfortunately, since then, > >still didn't have the chance to discuss this project with anybody, neither > >SMPP aspects, nor erlang related issues (and if I don't send this message, > > I feel I'll never do). > > Well done. Its a reasonably extensive protocol. > > I'll test it against my companys' SMPP implementation (in an SMSC > bypass/billing/routing solution, so it behaves both like an ASP and an > SMSC). It'll be good for both of us :-) > > Are you using it anywhere? > > /Bruce |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ANNOUNCE - graphics package: 00292, Luke Gorrie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | mnesia table fragmentation: 00292, Mohammad Reza Moosavi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SMPP v5.0 erlang implementationi: 00292, Bruce Fitzsimons |
| Next by Thread: | mnesia table fragmentation: 00292, Mohammad Reza Moosavi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |