|
Re: OS scheduling vs. VM scheduling: msg#00252lang.erlang.general
From: "Joachim Durchholz" <joachim.durchholz@xxxxxx> > When leafing through old messages, I hit on Vance Shipley's old "One > Million Processes" thread, and my mind made a connection to a recent > information snippet. > > The new Linux 2.6 kernels have been reported to spawn processes at a > rate of 100.000 within a relatively short time (seconds or very few > minutes). Hi, It will be interesting to see some real figures. There are some notes I'd like to make about your thoughts: > If that's true, one of the features of Erlang could be folded > back into the operating system. - with an important precondition: that one runs Erlang on Linux, which (at least today) is probably a minority of cases. Ericsson usually runs Solaris, and I think they count as the heaviest user. - Spawning processes is just one facet. If context switching time isn't correspondingly improved, there is still a long way to the Erlang performance. /Vlad |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: How do I find my own IP address?: 00252, Joachim Durchholz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ANNOUNCE ex11 release two: 00252, Joe Armstrong |
| Previous by Thread: | OS scheduling vs. VM schedulingi: 00252, Joachim Durchholz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: OS scheduling vs. VM scheduling: 00252, Ulf Wiger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |