|
Re: ANNOUNCE ex11 release two: msg#00248lang.erlang.general
From: "Joe Armstrong" <joe@xxxxxxx> > On the contrary I think this is *exactly* how it should be done. I can see your point, it's more flexible, even if it's more to write :-). The possibility to (accidentaly) sending a callback that does a lot of computations remains, and the widget (not the Ui, you're right) becomes unresponsive then. What about crashes in the callbacks? Is it enough to wrap them in a catch? /Vlad |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Stripped down Erlang?: 00248, Joe Armstrong |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ANNOUNCE ex11 release two: 00248, Joe Armstrong |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ANNOUNCE ex11 release twoi: 00248, Joe Armstrong |
| Next by Thread: | Re: ANNOUNCE ex11 release two: 00248, Joe Armstrong |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |