|
Re: ets:match(Continuation) usage question.: msg#00386lang.erlang.general
On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:48, Jeff Einhorn wrote: > I was wondering what happens if updates are made to an ets table while an > ets:match(Continuation) search is being ran? > thanks for your time, > -jeff Jeff, I am not totally sure if this relates to your question, perhaps one of the ets authors could clarify, but I believe that if you do a ets:match with a continuation while updates are performed that it behaves similar to mnesia:dirty_next under the same circumstance i.e undefined. I think that there is an internal hash that is altered upon an updates. This alterations changes the internal structure in a way that is incompatible with continuations. I am not sure if I am totally on the mark here though. Cheers, Martin > > Jeffrey M. Einhorn > Software Engineer > Web Development Group > FutureSource, LLC > jeinhorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.futuresource.com > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Erlang in a french magazine (L'informaticien): 00386, Fabien Dagnat |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mnesia:match_object() on an ordered_set: 00386, Sean Hinde |
| Previous by Thread: | ets:match(Continuation) usage question.i: 00386, Jeff Einhorn |
| Next by Thread: | mapping implemented in functions vs in structures: 00386, HP Wei |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |