|
Re: Re: Patch review - Multi-dimensional arrays: msg#00050lang.boo.devel
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodrigo B. de Oliveira" <rodrigobamboo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <dev-lK5OYVT/OUeB6hVKlEQLGA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2005 1:42 PM Subject: [boo-dev] Re: Patch review - Multi-dimensional arrays
With the option to turn off any index normalising, I hope? I'm not sure what could be the best way to specify compiler options in code. It should at least not be one macro per option, as this would clutter the namespace. The #option option does not look very Boo, and I don't know if it's easy to add such directives to the AST, which it should be. Maybe an option macro for inline blocks, in combination with a compiler switch for global control and an option attribute to mark classes and methods? Hans-Christian
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [jira] Closed: (BOO-256) explict conversions from char to integers and integers to char, jira-yCVjj/EcxBJg9hUCZPvPmw |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [jira] Commented: (BOO-253) Substraction operator overloading called op_subtraction instead of op_substraction, jira-yCVjj/EcxBJg9hUCZPvPmw |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Patch review - Multi-dimensional arrays, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Patch review - partial classes, Rodrigo B. de Oliveira |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |