I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
many) cases where I made a decision about replacing
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(some_time);
with
msleep(jiffies_to_msecs(some_time));
msleep() is not exactly the same as the previous code, but I only did
this replacement where I thought long delays were *desired*. If this is
not the case here, then just disregard this patch.
Thanks,
Nish
Applys-to: 2.6.7
Description: Uses msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee
the task delays at least the desired time amount.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- linux-vanilla/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c 2004-06-16
05:18:59.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-dev/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2.c 2004-07-12 18:06:23.000000000
+0000
@@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ static s32 nforce2_access(struct i2c_ada
temp = inb_p(NVIDIA_SMB_STS);
}
if (~temp & NVIDIA_SMB_STS_DONE) {
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- schedule_timeout(HZ/100);
+ msleep(10);
temp = inb_p(NVIDIA_SMB_STS);
}
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
|