I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
a few) places where I had to make a decision to set the state before the
call to
schedule_timeout();
This of course affected any decision to replace the code with msleep()
or not. Please inform if the other state from the one I used is desired.
Thanks,
Nish
Applys-to: 2.6.7
Description: Remove pcf_sleep() and replace invocations with msleep().
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- linux-vanilla/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-pcf.c 2004-06-16
05:19:44.000000000 +0000
+++ linux-dev/drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-pcf.c 2004-07-02 17:48:33.000000000
+0000
@@ -101,12 +101,6 @@ static int wait_for_bb(struct i2c_algo_p
}
-static inline void pcf_sleep(unsigned long timeout)
-{
- schedule_timeout( timeout * HZ);
-}
-
-
static int wait_for_pin(struct i2c_algo_pcf_data *adap, int *status) {
int timeout = DEF_TIMEOUT;
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
|