I would appreciate any comments from the janitors list. This is one (of
a few) places where I had to make a decision to set the state before the
call to
schedule_timeout();
This of course affected any decision to replace the code with msleep()
or not. Please inform if the other state from the one I used is desired.
Thanks,
Nish
Applys-to: 2.6.7
Description: Uses msleep() instead of schedule_timeout() to guarantee
the task delays at least the desired time amount.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@xxxxxxxxxx>
--- linux-vanilla/drivers/char/ec3104_keyb.c 2004-06-16 05:19:22.000000000
+0000
+++ linux-dev/drivers/char/ec3104_keyb.c 2004-07-10 18:33:37.000000000
+0000
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static void ec3104_keyb_clear_state(void
k->last_msr = 0;
for (;;) {
- schedule_timeout(HZ/10);
+ msleep(100);
msr = ctrl_inb(EC3104_SER4_MSR);
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
|