Em Sat, May 29, 2004 at 03:50:23PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap escreveu:
| On Fri, 28 May 2004 22:40:34 -0600 (MDT) MJK <mkemp@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| |
| |
| | Compiles fine, took Randy's advice.
| |
| | Signed-off-by: MJK <mkemp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
| |
| | Sweet cuppin-cakes!
| | M. Kemp
|
| Hi,
|
| Those all look good to me.
|
| Now what it needs (IMO of course, but this comes from sending lots
| of patches to Andrew and getting feedback on them) is a more
| descriptive subject: line and description (in the email body)
| of what/why the patch is/does. Otherwise the patchset maintainer
| will have to generate all of that when the patch is forwarded,
| and s/he shouldn't have to do that extra bit.
In the better case s/he will do that. Andrew already droped
same patches from me because I did not descrbied than. :-)
--
Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
<http://www.telecentros.sp.gov.br>
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
|
