Domen Puncer wrote:
On 02/05/04 22:24 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
Hi,
It's the last REDIFF, but i'm not replacing yield() with
schedule_timeout() because there's a nicedelay() (maybe the
usecs need to be tuned below) there:
static inline void nicedelay(unsigned long usecs)
{
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
schedule_timeout(HZ);
return;
}
And usecs stands for??
Funny thing is that there are actualy uses of this function.
What do you think about msleep() as greg said?
Also, please make -p1 applyable patches.
I'm preparing my travel to debconf4, i'll be back on 30 May.In
early June i'll send rediffied patches.As i said in a previous
post it was my error.I was still considering the "old" SubmittingPatches.
Thanks,
Gustavo Franco
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
Kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
| 