logo       

Re: Strange backtrace: msg#00412

kde-devel

Subject: Re: Strange backtrace

2009/7/30 John Tapsell <johnflux@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> However, there's just no way that the pointer can change from 0x82097e8 to
>> 0xbfb99b78. The former pointer is an address in the heap, while the latter
>> is on the stack.
>
> 1) How can you tell?

Oooo, I was having trouble because of the way that they are written.
The first number only has 7 digits. So it's actually:

0x082097e8
0xbfb99b78

Now it's much more obvious that "0x08" is right at the top (heap) and
"0xbf" is near the bottom (stack). Thanks to Raphael for private
messaging me this answer :-)

Although, 0xbf seems to be roughly 1GB from the end ( 1.00429643
gigabytes according to google). This seems like a very large stack.
Is this reasonable?

JohnFlux

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

Google Custom Search

News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise