|
Re: Why MIDP, not PP? (was Re: MIDP 2.0 beta for palmOne devices now availa: msg#00242java.sun.kvm
Nathan, Thank you for this very informative answer. I appreciate you taking the time to explain the situation so clearly. Mark Balbes, Ph.D. Principal Software Engineer Object Computing, Inc. On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:15:01 -0800, Nathanial Freitas <Nathanial.Freitas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Peter, and all, > >I've commented on this before in this forum, as well as the Palm Java Forum, and I will do it again. Aside from fundamentally =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxx and include in the body of the message "signoff KVM-INTEREST". For general help, send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxx and include in the body of the message "help".
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why MIDP, not PP? (was Re: MIDP 2.0 beta for palmOne devices now available), Peter Rogers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Plea for assistance..., Adrian Hill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MIDP, not PP? (was Re: MIDP 2.0 beta for palmOne devices now available), Eric Giguere |
| Next by Thread: | Plea for assistance..., Adrian Hill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |