|
Why MIDP, not PP? (was Re: MIDP 2.0 beta for palmOne devices now available): msg#00227java.sun.kvm
I'm curious why Palm is putting so much emphasis on MIDP. I would think that the Personal Profile with the PDA optional APIs would be a better fit for their new devices. Anybody have any insight into this? Mark Balbes mark@xxxxxxxxxx On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:06:01 -0500, Eric Giguere <ericgiguere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >FYI, palmOne has released a beta MIDP 2.0/CLDC 1.1 environment. =========================================================================== To unsubscribe, send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxx and include in the body of the message "signoff KVM-INTEREST". For general help, send email to listserv@xxxxxxxxxxxx and include in the body of the message "help".
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: free midi/wavs, Marcelo Eduardo Moraes de Olivera |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why MIDP, not PP? (was Re: MIDP 2.0 beta for palmOne devices now available), Hector Berna |
| Previous by Thread: | free midi/wavs, lruckhaber |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MIDP, not PP? (was Re: MIDP 2.0 beta for palmOne devices now available), Hector Berna |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |