On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:26:15PM -0500, woods@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 06:45:32PM -0600, woods@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > I just stumbled upon the SISC, and from a first glance think that it
> > > offers an excellent means of developing applications for J2EE.
> > >
> > > Here's a simple request though: Would someone consider porting it
> > over to
> > > Mac OSX's darwinports? I'm certain that it would help tremendously
> > in
> > > popularizing SISC. A lot of schemers are already Mac-heads.
> >
> > I certainly hope so. But Matthias and I are both Linux on x86 users.
> > Anyone else out there willing and able to package it?
> >
> > Scott
> >
>
> My apologies. It appears that SISC has already been ported to darwinports!
>
> The portname is called SISC (for some reason I was searching under scheme
> and found mzscheme but not sisc). I've just installed it, and am happily
> trying it out.
Even better!
>
> Now to get he Mac-heads to use this more...
>
> Is there anything that Groovy, Jython, or JRuby can do in terms of
> bridging with Java libraries and the JVM and interoperating with Java
> semantics that SISC cannot?
If any of them compile classes on the fly, its possible that they may be
able to extend classes from the dynamic language. This is a feature
we'd like to add in the not too distance future. One can implement
interfaces quite easily using the define-java-proxy functionality
however.
Scott
pgptoMlbJcLav.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
