Re: AW: MDB discussion

Sounds good to me.  I'm a little weak on the telnet part, but aside from 
that I should be alright.  What's involved?

David Blevins wrote:

> How about this for an approach:
>
> David & Alan: Transaction integration.  We would need to get Tyrex 1.0
> integrated in there.  Complete tests for container-managed transaction
> attributes.  Tests for distributed transactions.  Now that I list out
> even some of the work, I'm crazy if I think I can get it all done by
> myself.
>
> Daniel & Jacek:  CMP 2.0.  CMP is much better for starting as it
> requires no change to the OpenEJB architecture.  MDB support requires
> the addition of asynchronous communication, a revamp of connector
> support.  It touches pretty much all the architecture on one way or
> another.
>
> Tim & unnamed:  Admin and Deployment Support.  This includes the HTTP,
> Telnet, and Console deployment and admin pieces.
>
> How does this sound?
>
> I think breaking up the project like this will really help tighten the
> team and the project. 
>
> -David
>  



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
http://OpenEJB.sf.net
OpenEJB-development mailing list
OpenEJB-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openejb-development