RE: AW: MDB discussion

How about this for an approach:

David & Alan: Transaction integration.  We would need to get Tyrex 1.0
integrated in there.  Complete tests for container-managed transaction
attributes.  Tests for distributed transactions.  Now that I list out
even some of the work, I'm crazy if I think I can get it all done by
myself.

Daniel & Jacek:  CMP 2.0.  CMP is much better for starting as it
requires no change to the OpenEJB architecture.  MDB support requires
the addition of asynchronous communication, a revamp of connector
support.  It touches pretty much all the architecture on one way or
another.

Tim & unnamed:  Admin and Deployment Support.  This includes the HTTP,
Telnet, and Console deployment and admin pieces.

How does this sound?

I think breaking up the project like this will really help tighten the
team and the project. 

-David


> -----Original Message-----
> From: openejb-development-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:openejb-development-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Daniel S. Haischt
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 12:55 PM
> To: openejb-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: AW: [OpenEJB-dev] AW: MDB discussion
> 
> 
> so how shall we form teams?
> 
> i for example would be interested in CMP details because i 
> have to create a new CMP container for the JDK 1.1.8 OpenEJB 
> port (aka PersonalChilli).
> 
> regards
> 
> daniel s. haischt
> --
> 
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: openejb-development-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:openejb-development-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]Im 
> Auftrag von 
> > Alan Cabrera
> > Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. Februar 2003 19:59
> > An: 'openejb-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; David Blevins
> > Cc: 'LASKOWSKI,JACEK (HP-Poland,ex1)'
> > Betreff: RE: [OpenEJB-dev] AW: MDB discussion
> >
> >
> > I kinda like David's Xtreme programming slant for this project.  I 
> > think that it's difficult for a single person to get 
> started on such 
> > big tasks. What do you think?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel S. Haischt [mailto:sirabyss@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 1:46 PM
> > > To: David Blevins; openejb-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: 'LASKOWSKI,JACEK (HP-Poland,ex1)'
> > > Subject: [OpenEJB-dev] AW: MDB discussion
> > >
> > >
> > > hello,
> > >
> > > > -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> > > > Von: David Blevins [mailto:david.blevins@xxxxxxxx]
> > > > Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. Februar 2003 19:30
> > > > An: openejb-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: 'LASKOWSKI,JACEK (HP-Poland,ex1)'; 'Daniel S. Haischt'
> > > > Betreff: MDB discussion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > Daniel and Jacek will be heading up the development on the MDB 
> > > > container.  Daniel has been studying MDBs for his diploma
> > > thesis and
> > > > has been experimenting with MDB container development.
> > > With the two
> > > > of them working together on the MDB support, we should see
> > > a whole lot
> > > > more development talk on the list.
> > >
> > > first of all i would like to clearify a thing ...
> > >
> > > yesterday we decided that Jacek is working on CMP support 
> according 
> > > to the EJB 2.1 spec.
> > >
> > > i in turn will work on connector support according to the J2EE 
> > > connector architecture spec v1.5. additionally i will work on MDB 
> > > support according to the EJB 2.1 spec.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps it's a good idea for us to work on pairs on 
> other things 
> > > > (transaction and security integration come to mind).  Such
> > > an approach
> > > > would require more on-list development and may foster a 
> stronger 
> > > > community.  Teams could pick regular times to pair up on
> > > IRC and talk
> > > > development.  Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Daniel and Jacek,
> > > >
> > > > Please give us some of the highlights on the MDB talks on IRC 
> > > > yesterday. Any ideas on what spec version we will be developing 
> > > > against? Was the "mdb_support" branch created?  What kind
> > > of ideas did
> > > > you discuss in regards to collaboration, development, 
> design, etc?
> > >
> > > i did not create the branch. we decided that i will work 
> on a branch 
> > > called 'mdb_support' and Jacek is working on a branch called 
> > > cmp_support.
> > >
> > > regards
> > >
> > > daniel s. haischt
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > http://OpenEJB.sf.net
> > > OpenEJB-development mailing list 
> > > OpenEJB-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openejb-development
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://OpenEJB.sf.net
> > OpenEJB-development mailing list 
> > OpenEJB-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openejb-development
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf 
> _______________________________________________
> http://OpenEJB.sf.net
> OpenEJB-development mailing list 
> OpenEJB-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openejb-development
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
http://OpenEJB.sf.net
OpenEJB-development mailing list
OpenEJB-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openejb-development