|
Re: 3.8 candidate: msg#00171java.junit.user
Here we see the dangers of running a subset of the whole suite. We only ran the tests for the new string diff code, and forgot to run the whole suite before checking in. It'll be fixed tonight. The problem with the unstable test is timing related and I'll also fix that. Kent --- In junit@xxxx, Mike Clark <mike@xxxx> wrote: > There also seems to be a compatibility issue with the JUnit 3.8 > candidate and the current version of the JUnit task for Ant: > > test: > [junit] java.lang.NoSuchMethodError > [junit] at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.PlainJUnitResult > Formatter.startTest(PlainJUnitResultFormatter.java:188) > [junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.startTest (TestResult.java:151) > [junit] at junit.framework.TestResult.run (TestResult.java:103) > [junit] at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:122) > [junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest (TestSuite.java:208) > [junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203) > [junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest (TestSuite.java:208) > [junit] at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:203) > [junit] at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner. > run(JUnitTestRunner.java:231) > [junit] at > org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTestRunner. > main(JUnitTestRunner.java:409) > [junit] Exception in thread "main" > > > Mike
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Re: distinguishing between failures and errors, J. B. Rainsberger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: assertEquals("NaN", x, y, 0.0) where x=y=Double.NaN, Morten Grum, PH-Consult |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 3.8 candidate, Mike Clark |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Re: distinguishing between failures and errors, Daniel Barclay |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |