RE: JBoss-3.0.1RC1 Released

Ok, thanks same as tomcat (should have thought of that!, d'oh!)

-----Original Message-----
From: David Ward [mailto:david.ward@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:04 AM
To: jboss-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss-3.0.1RC1 Released


The root context is a special case (obviously).  Name your war file 
ROOT.war (case sensitive).

As far as a tool, admins (at least UNIX admins) love command line (as I 
do).  I guess you could overcomplicate a couple mv's with a shell script 
if you wanted...

David

--

LaBanca, Rick wrote:
> Ok, that would work, what do you name it for root (empty context-name as I
> set)?
> 
> I still wish there was  more deploy control though. It would be handy to
be
> able to have wars sitting there undeployed and be able to switch them in
and
> out via a tool.
> 
> Rick
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Ward [mailto:david.ward@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 8:47 AM
> To: jboss-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss-3.0.1RC1 Released
> 
> 
> If you're just deploying war files, you can just omit the jboss-web.xml 
> and rename the war file to whatever you want, and that will be the 
> context-root.
> 
> For example, with not context-root in jboss-web.xml, naming a war file 
> foobar.war and dropping it in the deploy directory will give your web 
> app a contex-root of /foobar/.  The name myapp.war will have a 
> context-root of /myapp/, etc.
> 
> Regards,
> David
> 
> --
> 
> LaBanca, Rick wrote:
> 
>>I take it 3.0.1's goals are stability/fixes. Where should suggestions get
>>submitted?
>>
>>One I have is this, up for discussion/opinion. Right now it seems the way
> 
> to
> 
>>say the context name war is mapped to is in jboss-web.xml
> 
> (<context-root>).
> 
>>But this resides inside the war. 
>>
>>For me, I would expect generally anything server specific to be externally
>>defined, or mapped. Right now it seems like a delivered app/war would have
>>to have my admin open and edit a jar to change the context mapping, which
>>seems wrong. 
>>
>>So for this particular case,  wouldn't it make sense to have some external
>>config (not sure which file) allowing the mapping of what's in
> 
> jboss-web.xml
> 
>>for context name to something else?  
>>
>>Of course I hope I just missed something and there is a way, I did look
> 
> thru
> 
>>the dtd's and couldn't see where I would do it... But I'm very new to
> 
> jboss.
> 
>>
>>rick
> 



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
JBoss-user mailing list
JBoss-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf