|
Re: [ERROR] NAKACK.handleXmitReq(): msg#00049java.javagroups.general
Gianluca Puggelli wrote: > Bela, > at the moment I'm around 800 million of messages without any > problem, with the protocol stack that you sent with the previous > message (tcp_nio). Good. I'm currently at 1'874'000'000 messages received (out of 6 billion), memory is stable. > One hour ago I attached the jconsole to java processes and now I > discovered that there are 39 live threads in the coordinator while > 34 are in the other two members. > > But in one hour the coordinator created ~550 threads while the other > members only ~50. Do you know why ? The coordinator has some additional tasks to do, compared to regular (non-coordinator) members, e.g. * Merge: coord sends out a merge multicast every 20-100secs * FD ((everyone though) sends out are-you-alive messages) * With TCP_NIO, idle threads will be killed off, and started at a later time again if needed (we use PooledExecutor) * Timer The peak number of threads is always higher on the coord, but the number of live threads should be about the same -- Bela Ban Lead JGroups / Manager JBoss Clustering Group JBoss - a division of Red Hat ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ERROR] NAKACK.handleXmitReq(), Gianluca Puggelli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ERROR] NAKACK.handleXmitReq(), Bela Ban |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ERROR] NAKACK.handleXmitReq(), Gianluca Puggelli |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ERROR] NAKACK.handleXmitReq(), Bela Ban |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |