|
Re: Asynchonrous and synchronous messages on same channel: msg#00016java.javagroups.general
> > So when you publish to a JMS topic, don't you have the receivers send > back acks for the received topics (similar to queues) ? If that's the > case you probably need the MessageDispatcher, otherwise simply send > messages via Channel.send() > We used to do it that way, but not any more. For persistent (reliable) messages, since we persist the message on the sending node before sending, then we don't need acks from the other members of the group, since if they crash they will reload the message from storage on restart - so it's not lost. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Asynchonrous and synchronous messages on same channel, Bela Ban |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Send one message vs send many messages performance, Tim Fox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Asynchonrous and synchronous messages on same channel, Bela Ban |
| Next by Thread: | Send one message vs send many messages performance, Tim Fox |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |