|
Antwort: Re: ImageJ mdi version: msg#00246java.imagej
Yep, I also think MDI for ImageJ would not be really useful, yet I think having the main window come on top too, when any of its windows has the focus would be very useful (I remember that was already discussed some messages ago, I also find myself often in the position: "Where the "§$$% has the ImageJ main window gone?") Vice versa (both of these optione could be user selectable), immediatelly hiding all children windows when the Imagej main window becomes hidden would be IMHO very useful too! Joachim Gabriel Landini <G.Landini@BHAM. An: IMAGEJ@xxxxxxxxxxxx AC.UK> Kopie: (Blindkopie: Joachim Wesner/DEWET/LMSCentral/Leica) Gesendet von: Thema: Re: ImageJ mdi version ImageJ Interest Group <IMAGEJ@xxxxxxxx .GOV> 25.03.2006 11:16 Bitte antworten an ImageJ Interest Group On Friday 24 March 2006 19:04, Damien Farrell wrote: > Anyone interested in the development of a version of ImageJ that uses a > single Swing desktop pane for all windows. Damien, What is the advantage of having a single pane? My past experience with another imaging programme (the defunct Optimas) was that only 1 pane with everything inside was a bit of a pain rather than a plus, but there must be some advantages that I haven't thought about. Cheers, Gabriel ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: ImageJ mdi version, Gabriel Landini |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Antwort: Re: ImageJ mdi version, Damien Farrell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ImageJ mdi version, Gabriel Landini |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Antwort: Re: ImageJ mdi version, Damien Farrell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |