logo       

Antwort: Re: ImageJ mdi version: msg#00246

java.imagej

Subject: Antwort: Re: ImageJ mdi version

Yep, I also think MDI for ImageJ would not be really useful, yet I think
having the main window come on top too, when any of its windows has the
focus
would be very useful (I remember that was already discussed some messages
ago, I also find myself often in the position: "Where the "§$$% has the
ImageJ main window gone?")

Vice versa (both of these optione could be user selectable), immediatelly
hiding all children windows when the Imagej main window becomes hidden
would be IMHO very useful too!

Joachim





Gabriel Landini

<G.Landini@BHAM. An: IMAGEJ@xxxxxxxxxxxx

AC.UK> Kopie: (Blindkopie: Joachim
Wesner/DEWET/LMSCentral/Leica)
Gesendet von: Thema: Re: ImageJ mdi version

ImageJ Interest

Group

<IMAGEJ@xxxxxxxx

.GOV>





25.03.2006 11:16

Bitte antworten

an ImageJ

Interest Group







On Friday 24 March 2006 19:04, Damien Farrell wrote:
> Anyone interested in the development of a version of ImageJ that uses a
> single Swing desktop pane for all windows.

Damien,
What is the advantage of having a single pane?

My past experience with another imaging programme (the defunct Optimas) was

that only 1 pane with everything inside was a bit of a pain rather than a
plus, but there must be some advantages that I haven't thought about.

Cheers,

Gabriel



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise