Re: Java 2 Platform, Standard Edition (J2SE) 5.0 Release 3

I have been using 5.0 since the first developer preview release  
because some of my plugins use 5.0 code (generics and such) and i  
never had a problem.
kurt
On 16 Nov 2005, at 14:11, Mark Burge wrote:

> The default behavior of the update is to leave the current version of
> Java as the default version and to make the 5.0 version available as
> an alternative.  So, unless you specifically select the 5.0 version as
> the new default (via an application in /applications/utility/java) it
> will not make a difference.  The update automatically detects applets
> and applications which do use the new 5.0 API and transparently
> switches to the 5.0 JVM/API for those applets/applications.  ImageJ
> does not make use of the 5.0 API - though it should work fine, and
> possibly more efficiently with the new JVM.  If you are feeling
> adventurous you could enable it via the above mentioned app, try it
> out, and if it doesn't work switch back.
>
> ---
> Dr. Mark Burge
> http://imagingbook.com/
>
> On 11/16/05, Michael J. Herron <herro001@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Auto update on Mac OS 10.4 is telling me to install "Java 2 Platform,
> > Standard Edition (J2SE) 5.0 Release 3"
> > Is this a good idea for ImageJ 1.34s   ?
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Michael J. Herron,  U of MN, Dept. of Entomology
> >   herro001@xxxxxxx

*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*
University of Sheffield
Academic Neurology Unit
Division of Genomic Medicine
E Floor, Medical School
Beech Hill Road
Sheffield
S10 2RX
United Kingdom

Tel: ++44 (0) 114 271 2473
Fax: ++44 (0) 114 226 1201
Email: K.DeVos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*