|
Re: bug-to-bug compatibility - another issue: msg#00935java.harmony.devel
On 2/22/06, Paulex Yang <paulex.yang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This paragraph is just what I want to say about the bug compatibility, > my idea is: > 1. we should comply with spec > 2. if RI is contradict with spec, and RI is not logical(sometimes it is > very obvious, you know what I mean), we comply with RI; else, we discuss > it case by case. > 3. if spec is not so clear, we should comply with RI > 4. if some application failing on that different behavior, we discuss it > case by case and +1 from me :-). IMHO, excellent guideline. Bugs can be both in the spec and in the RI impl. For all non-trivial cases logic and discussion here in mailing list should help us to decide what to comply. -- Anton Avtamonov, Intel Middleware Products Division
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: bug-to-bug compatibility - another issue, Anton Avtamonov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: bug-to-bug compatibility - another issue, Mikhail Loenko |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: bug-to-bug compatibility - another issue, Paulex Yang |
| Next by Thread: | Re: bug-to-bug compatibility - another issue, Tim Ellison |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |