|
RE: [ 1608715 ] New Quick-Fixes for the eclipse plug-in: msg#00022java.findbugs.general
Hi Peter Thank you for your quick and detailed answer. We are now fixing your issues so that we can upload the new patch as soon as possible. There are some questions regarding our refactoring: 1)Should we merge our BugFix class with your FindBugsFixer? As a consequence the Exception-Handling would change as we are using a different one in BugFix. 2)We use to extract the Exception-classes in an own package. Is it ok if we make an own package where we put all the Exceptions in quickfix? 3)We changed the name of our classes to XYZResolution. Can we change also the name of the other classes from XYZFixer to XYZResolution? Thanks, Marco and Thierry -----Original Message----- From: Peter Friese [mailto:pfriese@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wed 12/6/2006 12:21 AM To: Busarello Marco (mbusarel@xxxxxx) Cc: findbugs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [FB-Discuss] [ 1608715 ] New Quick-Fixes for the eclipse plug-in Hi Marco and Thierry, thanks for the patch - great you're working on this topic! I've got some questions and remarks: 1) I like the idea of declaring the quick fixes externally. However, being an advocate of good Eclipse citizenship, I'd very much prefer having an extension point that others could extend. That way, it'd be much easier for people to contribute their own quick fixes. 2) Could you please make sure all JavaDocs are correct? I spotted some class comments that had wrong classnames. Also, I'd like to ask you to remove the dashed comment lines. 3) Generally speaking, I'd like to ask you to improve javadoc a bit and provide more significant comments than just "<CODE>BugFix</CODE> is an extension to the <CODE>FindBugsFixer</CODE>." 4) While you're at it: why not streamline the class names of the quick fix classes? The existing quick fix classes are direct subclasses of FindBugsFixer and are all named XYZFixer, whereas your classes are subclasses of BugFix and are named XYZFix. Although I like either naming scheme, I suggest to adapt the Eclipse naming scheme (XYZResolution). Regarding the functionality of the quick fixes, they seem to work pretty well. If you could fix these little issues, I'll happily apply the updated patch. Thanks, Peter On 12/5/06, mbusarel@xxxxxx <mbusarel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi > > Thierry Wyss and me are two students of the University of Applied Sciences > in Rapperswil, Switzerland. > We are working on the Quickfixes for the FindBugs eclipse plugin and > yesterday we submitted > our first patch through the patches tracker (see [ 1608715 ] New > Quick-Fixes for the eclipse plug-in). > > We uploaded this patch to see if our way to develope meets the > requirements of FindBugs. > Therefore we would appreciate to have soon a feedback from you. > > Thanks in advance. > > Best regards > > Marco Busarello (mbusarel@xxxxxx) > Thierry Wyss (twyss@xxxxxx) > > > _______________________________________________ > Findbugs-discuss mailing list > Findbugs-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.cs.umd.edu/mailman/listinfo/findbugs-discuss >
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ 1608715 ] New Quick-Fixes for the eclipse plug-in, Peter Friese |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ 1608715 ] New Quick-Fixes for the eclipse plug-in, Peter Friese |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ 1608715 ] New Quick-Fixes for the eclipse plug-in, Peter Friese |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ 1608715 ] New Quick-Fixes for the eclipse plug-in, Peter Friese |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |