Re: [xmlc] BCEL question

Quoting David Li <taweili@xxxxxxxxx>:

> By taking out this. ;)
>

You mean simply removing that one il.append() statement it will all work
properly?  Or did you mean changing the "class$L" and className.replace('.',
'$') stuff to something else?

I really don't understand this BCEL stuff much, nor do I really care to.  But
I'm curious as to why the BCELIfier generated the code this way?  You did say
you originally generated this, right?  The ASMifier does a great job.  I had to
change very little of that code, other than to suit my own purposes.

After I get this working, I'll try to cut a release.... unless you want to work
on the pretty printing stuff for XHTML, which I've suggested a few times in the
past :-)

Jake

>
>
> On Aug 26, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Jacob Kjome wrote:
>
> >         il.append(_factory.createFieldAccess(className, "class$L" +
> > className.replace('.', '$'), new ObjectType(
> >                 "java.lang.Class"), Constants.GETSTATIC));
>
>
>





--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xmlc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xmlc-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For general help: mailto:sympa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws