logo       

Re: XMLC vs. JAVA TEMPLATE METHOD: msg#00017

java.enhydra.xmlc

Subject: Re: XMLC vs. JAVA TEMPLATE METHOD

Hi John,

For a quick response, check out the article I wrote awhile back at:
http://www.theserverside.com/resources/article.jsp?l=XMLCvsJSP

I've also got an old slide presentation (powerpoint) you can download at
http://www.kspar.net/xmlcIntro.ppt

BTW, I had to approve your posting since this is a monitored list. Feel free to join the group at
http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/mailingLists/index.html

Regards,
David


John J. Westerkamp wrote:

Hi,

I am considering using XMLC for a large J2EE project. I currenlty create
HTML pages which are
doctored to include the XSLT commands. From this perspective, I definitely
see the advantage of a simple
HTML page without page designers having to know XSLT. What I do not like,
is seeing a bunch of new Java
classes for every HTML page in my design. I currently use a template base
class to do all of the XML document
generation using Metadata to link the XML tags to variable names in a
Java list object. I only have a single
class that is used to generate all of the documents for every HTML page.
Can I hear some arguments as to
how I can do this with XMLC and why using XMLC would be a better approach?


Thanks!

John Westerkamp
Productivity Network Innovations, LLC


--
David H. Young
SAMBA Holdings, Inc.
Chief Technology Officer
1730 Montaño NW
Albuquerque, NM 87107
505.797.2622 x113
http://www.samba.biz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise