logo       

Re: Re: Xmlc: Class not found: msg#00016

java.enhydra.xmlc

Subject: Re: Re: Xmlc: Class not found

At 10:12 AM 11/10/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Am Samstag, 8. November 2003 09:02 schrieb xmlc-request@xxxxxxxxxxx:
> I would still recommend replacing XMLC-2.2.1 with the latest XMLC-2.2.3.

You are right: Its XMLC 2.2.x, not 2.1.x

> Also note that it is recommended that you use the
> XMLCDeferredParsingFactory rather than the XMLCStdFactory even if you are
> not going to take advantage of deferred parsing or dynamic loading. The
> former is backward compatible with the latter, but not vice-versa.

What are the advantages and how do I set it up?

Well, XMLCStdFactory may be deprecated and if you use the -for-deferred-parsing flag at compile time but your code uses XMLCStdFactory, you will get a runtime error. Note that deferred parsing allows you to compile templates without the compile class containing the markup. Your classes become far smaller. The markup is gotten at runtime from the markup file (by putting the file in the classpath relative to where the XMLC class being loaded exists or by configuring an external resource path). A nice side-effect is that it allows for runtime reloading of XMLC files. See the 2.2 release notes for more info..
http://xmlc.enhydra.org/project/aboutProject/xmlc22release.html

The two are set up in a very similar way...

XMLCFactory xmlcFactory = null;

xmlcFactory = new XMLCStdFactory(Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(), null);
or
xmlcFactory = new XMLCDeferredParsingFactory(null, Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader(), null);

xmlcFactory.create(MyPageHTML.class);

See the Tomcat example that ships with XMLC 2.2.x (and the other two examples which don't require a servlet container). It uses both deferred parsing and dynamic loading (both provided by the XMLCDeferredParsingFactory.


Jake

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise