At 11:14 AM 10/7/2003 -0400, you wrote:
On Monday 06 October 2003 19:14, Jacob Kjome wrote:
> > This may, in
> >fact, be exacerbated by the fact that we're sending "Content-type:
> >text/html", but that's being done because there doesn't seem to be an
> > agreed upon solution for xhtml (last time I looked).
>
> For application/xhtml+xml, use....
> -domfactory org.enhydra.xml.xhtml.XHTMLDomFactory
>
When I specify this as my content type, Mozilla displays this,
This XML file does not appear to have any style information
associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
followed by an tree version of the XML. This is not what I want or need.
Can you send a minimal sample template for me to test (again, attached
inside a zip file to your reply)? Also, can you provide the resulting
output that you get (copy of the view-source, again, in the attached zip
file). And, finally, provide the information you find after doing a
right-click on the document in the browser and choosing "View Page
Info". Most important would be the "Type", "Render Mode", and
"Encoding". Also, what version of Mozilla are you using?
Without this information, I can't help you much. I've had no problem
having Mozilla display XHTML files in my testing so far. It is possible
you might have uncovered a bug, but I'd have to verify that using the
testcase you provide.
Jake
> For text/html, use....
> -domfactory org.enhydra.xml.xhtml.HTMLDomFactory
>
> Does that help?
>
> Jake
| 